<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>V/Speak &#187; Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://veneski.com/tag/online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://veneski.com</link>
	<description>David Veneski's clip sheet on Digital Marketing, Media, &#38; Tech news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:25:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Digital Outlook Report &#8211; Razorfish</title>
		<link>http://veneski.com/2009/03/10/2009-digital-outlook-report-razorfish/</link>
		<comments>http://veneski.com/2009/03/10/2009-digital-outlook-report-razorfish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Veneski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrated Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veneski.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Razorfish released their 2009 Digital Outlook Report yesterday.   Interesting read that covers a new role for agencies, what&#8217;s emerging, consumer conversations, the evolution of research and measurement, and 3 things every executive should know in 2009.  I thought the &#8220;Trends in Social Influence Marketing&#8221; and &#8220;Bringing Media Mix Models Into the Digital Era&#8221; were very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="social4i" style="height:29px;">
<div class="social4in" style="height:29px;float: right;">
<div class="socialicons s4twitter" style="float:left;margin-right: 10px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://veneski.com/2009/03/10/2009-digital-outlook-report-razorfish/" data-counturl="http://veneski.com/2009/03/10/2009-digital-outlook-report-razorfish/" data-text="2009 Digital Outlook Report &#8211; Razorfish" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via=""></a></div>
<div class="socialicons s4fblike" style="float:left;margin-right: 10px;">
<div id="fb-root"></div>
<p><fb:like href="http%3A%2F%2Fveneski.com%2F2009%2F03%2F10%2F2009-digital-outlook-report-razorfish%2F" send="false" layout="button_count" width="100" height="21" show_faces="false" font=""></fb:like></div>
<div class="socialicons s4plusone" style="float:left;margin-right: 10px;"><g:plusone size="medium" href="http://veneski.com/2009/03/10/2009-digital-outlook-report-razorfish/" count="true"></g:plusone></div>
<div class="socialicons s4fbshare" style="position: relative;float:left;margin-right: 10px;">
<div class="s4ifbshare" ><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http%3A%2F%2Fveneski.com%2F2009%2F03%2F10%2F2009-digital-outlook-report-razorfish%2F" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php"></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
</div>
<p>Razorfish released their 2009 <a href="http://digitaloutlook.razorfish.com/publication/?i=13617" target="_blank">Digital Outlook Report</a> yesterday.   Interesting read that covers a new role for agencies, what&#8217;s emerging, consumer conversations, the evolution of research and measurement, and 3 things every executive should know in 2009.  I thought the &#8220;Trends in Social Influence Marketing&#8221; and &#8220;Bringing Media Mix Models Into the Digital Era&#8221; were very insightful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://veneski.com/2009/03/10/2009-digital-outlook-report-razorfish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changing the way we look at measuring online advertising</title>
		<link>http://veneski.com/2009/02/23/changing-the-way-we-look-at-measuring-online-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://veneski.com/2009/02/23/changing-the-way-we-look-at-measuring-online-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Veneski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veneski.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Advertising Age states: &#8220;A mere mouse move can&#8217;t measure influence&#8220;.  That&#8217;s a smart statement, but one that many advertisers are not listening to.  The article goes on to state &#8220;&#8230;.ComScore research, which studied 139 online ad campaigns by marrying data from its panel of U.S. internet users with shopper data, found online ads, even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="social4i" style="height:29px;">
<div class="social4in" style="height:29px;float: right;">
<div class="socialicons s4twitter" style="float:left;margin-right: 10px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://veneski.com/2009/02/23/changing-the-way-we-look-at-measuring-online-advertising/" data-counturl="http://veneski.com/2009/02/23/changing-the-way-we-look-at-measuring-online-advertising/" data-text="Changing the way we look at measuring online advertising" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via=""></a></div>
<div class="socialicons s4fblike" style="float:left;margin-right: 10px;">
<div id="fb-root"></div>
<p><fb:like href="http%3A%2F%2Fveneski.com%2F2009%2F02%2F23%2Fchanging-the-way-we-look-at-measuring-online-advertising%2F" send="false" layout="button_count" width="100" height="21" show_faces="false" font=""></fb:like></div>
<div class="socialicons s4plusone" style="float:left;margin-right: 10px;"><g:plusone size="medium" href="http://veneski.com/2009/02/23/changing-the-way-we-look-at-measuring-online-advertising/" count="true"></g:plusone></div>
<div class="socialicons s4fbshare" style="position: relative;float:left;margin-right: 10px;">
<div class="s4ifbshare" ><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http%3A%2F%2Fveneski.com%2F2009%2F02%2F23%2Fchanging-the-way-we-look-at-measuring-online-advertising%2F" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php"></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
</div>
<p><a href="null"></a><a href="null"></a><a href="null"></a></p>
<p>As <a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=134787" target="_blank">Advertising Age</a> states: &#8220;<em>A mere mouse move can&#8217;t measure influence</em>&#8220;. </p>
<p><strong>That&#8217;s a smart statement, but one that many advertisers are not listening to.</strong> </p>
<p>The article goes on to state &#8220;&#8230;.<em>ComScore research, which studied 139 online ad campaigns by marrying data from its panel of U.S. internet users with shopper data, found online ads, even when they didn&#8217;t result in a click, increased a consumer&#8217;s likelihood of making a purchase at an advertiser&#8217;s retail store by 17% and increased visits to a marketer&#8217;s website by an average of 40%.</em>&#8220; </p>
<p>Net net?  Just because they didn&#8217;t click doesn&#8217;t mean they aren&#8217;t engaged.  As a person responsible for media myself, I sometimes forget that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://veneski.com/2009/02/23/changing-the-way-we-look-at-measuring-online-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you think TV spots work online, untouched?</title>
		<link>http://veneski.com/2009/02/20/do-you-think-tv-spots-work-online-untouched/</link>
		<comments>http://veneski.com/2009/02/20/do-you-think-tv-spots-work-online-untouched/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Veneski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veneski.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s long been the practice of advertisers to simply slap their TV commercials online as video advertising units.  I&#8217;ve long thought it doesn&#8217;t work &#8211; rather, that you need to tailor the spot specifically for the medium.  This Adotas article supports that and points to 3 basic tenants for success: Tell a story Make it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="social4i" style="height:29px;">
<div class="social4in" style="height:29px;float: right;">
<div class="socialicons s4twitter" style="float:left;margin-right: 10px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://veneski.com/2009/02/20/do-you-think-tv-spots-work-online-untouched/" data-counturl="http://veneski.com/2009/02/20/do-you-think-tv-spots-work-online-untouched/" data-text="Do you think TV spots work online, untouched?" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via=""></a></div>
<div class="socialicons s4fblike" style="float:left;margin-right: 10px;">
<div id="fb-root"></div>
<p><fb:like href="http%3A%2F%2Fveneski.com%2F2009%2F02%2F20%2Fdo-you-think-tv-spots-work-online-untouched%2F" send="false" layout="button_count" width="100" height="21" show_faces="false" font=""></fb:like></div>
<div class="socialicons s4plusone" style="float:left;margin-right: 10px;"><g:plusone size="medium" href="http://veneski.com/2009/02/20/do-you-think-tv-spots-work-online-untouched/" count="true"></g:plusone></div>
<div class="socialicons s4fbshare" style="position: relative;float:left;margin-right: 10px;">
<div class="s4ifbshare" ><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http%3A%2F%2Fveneski.com%2F2009%2F02%2F20%2Fdo-you-think-tv-spots-work-online-untouched%2F" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php"></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
</div>
<p>It&#8217;s long been the practice of advertisers to simply slap their TV commercials online as video advertising units.  I&#8217;ve long thought it doesn&#8217;t work &#8211; rather, that you need to tailor the spot specifically for the medium.  This <a href="http://www.adotas.com/2008/11/tv-spots-dont-work-online-heres-what-does/" target="_blank">Adotas article</a> supports that and points to 3 basic tenants for success:</p>
<ol>
<li>Tell a story</li>
<li>Make it interactive</li>
<li>Finish with a strong call to action. </li>
</ol>
<p>I agree.  Michael Radigan&#8217;s last line in the article sums it up best for Digital Video Advertisers:  &#8220;<em>Let’s stop being lazy and get some practice making online videos for the active viewer</em>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://veneski.com/2009/02/20/do-you-think-tv-spots-work-online-untouched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

